news

Interview with Michael Springer, Associate Professor of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School

Posted: 17 March 2016 | Caroline Richards | No comments yet

Caroline Richards, Editor of Drug Target Review, invites Michael Springer, Associate Professor of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School to discuss a laboratory study of a yeast model using microfluidic systems…

Michael Springer, Associate Professor of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School

Caroline Richards, Editor of Drug Target Review, invites Michael Springer, Associate Professor of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School to discuss a laboratory study of a yeast model using microfluidic systems.

What kinds of research does your laboratory currently focus on?

Our lab works on trying to understand how cells make decisions when they are faced with multiple sets of inputs and we do this mainly through a lot of comparative physiologies – that is, comparing different strains and their differences in responses at the molecular level, following things like fluorescent probes for expression, or changes in localisation between different proteins.

 

access your free copy

 


Automation now plays a central role in discovery. From self-driving laboratories to real-time bioprocessing

This report explores how data-driven systems improve reproducibility, speed decisions and make scale achievable across research and development.

Inside the report:

  • Advance discovery through miniaturised, high-throughput and animal-free systems
  • Integrate AI, robotics and analytics to speed decision-making
  • Streamline cell therapy and bioprocess QC for scale and compliance
  • And more!

This report unlocks perspectives that show how automation is changing the scale and quality of discovery. The result is faster insight, stronger data and better science – access your free copy today

 

Can you describe the challenges you have faced with microfluidic systems?

We tried using microfluidics in a couple of different formats beforehand. For the first, we retrieved designs of microfluidic systems from other people, copied their designs and then tried to get them to work. However, we found that either the design often does not work exactly as the originators said it would, or that you actually need those people with you in order to get the design to work as they intended. We found modifying someone else’s design is extremely difficult to do. We then started making our own designs but, as we were warned, there is a steep learning curve, and just making the microfluidic device was in itself quite challenging. It becomes as much of a project to actually make the device as it does to do the experiment.

Related organisations
,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *