news

Interview with Michael Springer, Associate Professor of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School

Posted: 17 March 2016 | Caroline Richards | No comments yet

Caroline Richards, Editor of Drug Target Review, invites Michael Springer, Associate Professor of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School to discuss a laboratory study of a yeast model using microfluidic systems…

Michael Springer, Associate Professor of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School

Caroline Richards, Editor of Drug Target Review, invites Michael Springer, Associate Professor of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School to discuss a laboratory study of a yeast model using microfluidic systems.

What kinds of research does your laboratory currently focus on?

Our lab works on trying to understand how cells make decisions when they are faced with multiple sets of inputs and we do this mainly through a lot of comparative physiologies – that is, comparing different strains and their differences in responses at the molecular level, following things like fluorescent probes for expression, or changes in localisation between different proteins.

 

Reserve your FREE place

 


Reduce preclinical failures with smarter off-target profiling

24 September 2025 | 15:00PM BST | FREE Webinar

Join this webinar to hear from Dr Emilie Desfosses as she shares insights into how in vitro and in silico methods can support more informed, human-relevant safety decisions -especially as ethical and regulatory changes continue to reshape preclinical research.

What you’ll learn:

  • Approaches for prioritizing follow-up studies and refining risk mitigation strategies
  • How to interpret hit profiles from binding and functional assays
  • Strategies for identifying organ systems at risk based on target activity modulation
  • How to use visualization tools to assess safety margins and compare compound profiles

Register Now – It’s Free!

 

Can you describe the challenges you have faced with microfluidic systems?

We tried using microfluidics in a couple of different formats beforehand. For the first, we retrieved designs of microfluidic systems from other people, copied their designs and then tried to get them to work. However, we found that either the design often does not work exactly as the originators said it would, or that you actually need those people with you in order to get the design to work as they intended. We found modifying someone else’s design is extremely difficult to do. We then started making our own designs but, as we were warned, there is a steep learning curve, and just making the microfluidic device was in itself quite challenging. It becomes as much of a project to actually make the device as it does to do the experiment.

Related organisations
,